Liability Medicare Set Asides (LMSA)

What is Current CMS Thinking About Liability MSA?

Members of the National Association of Settlement Purchasers met with the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently to discuss what’s doing with Liability Medicare Set Aside Arrangements.

Some highlights of the meeting as reported by my colleague Tom Stanley:

  • CMS stated they have an 18-month timeframe (from April 2018) before it rolls out a LMSA Review program.
  • The program would be voluntary.
  • CMS has indicated that their enforcement mechanism is the denial of services.
  • CMS felt strongly that the injured party must receive something (free and clear) through settlement.
  • CMS would not review an LMSA until Settlement has been reached.
  • CMS feels a LMSA is exclusively the responsibility of the plaintiff.
  • Regarding LMSA’s, CMS made it clear that the defendant(s), and their insurers, are not a target.
  • Medicare pricing of services was discussed.
  • CMS does not feel it can mandate professional administration.
  • CMS would publish a LMSA Reference Guide.
  • Eligibility remains the same as the current WCMSA system – Medicare beneficiaries or injured parties who have a reasonable expectation of Medicare eligibility within 30 months. Per statute, Medicare’s interest must be considered in every claim.
  • A workload thresholdof $250,000 is anticipated – “NO SAFE HARBOR”. This level mirrors the $25,000 workload threshold for WCMSA’s.
  • For settlements between $250,000 and $750,000 threshold, CMS approval is available and encouraged by CMS. CMS would apply “a formula” to determine the LMSA amount. Starting with the total settlement amount , , CMS would subtract certain expenses and apply the discount factor to total settlement.
  • Above $750,000 level is a full commutation. A traditional MSA would be prepared and, if submitted to CMS, evaluated by CMS for adequacy.

 

Learn more about
Medicare Set Aside Arrangements

Share on :

Latest Blogs

Why “Structured Settlements to Crypto” is a Terrible Idea for Injury Victims

Tax, Risk, and Suitability Issues in Structured Settlement–to‑Crypto Conversions The Pitch Sounds Modern. The Reality Is Dangerous. Every few years, someone tries to bolt the

Weiss Ratings | John Darer Reviews What is a Weiss Rating?

Weiss Ratings is Not Paid to Rate Who is Weiss Ratings? Weiss Ratings has been in operation since 1971, but in the realm of structured

IRC 130(c) Unwind Clause in Qualified Assignments | Best Practices

John Darer Reviews What Can Happen Without Proper Care in this blog John Darer reviews what can go wrong if a qualified assignment is not

QSF Management: Convenience vs Compliance?

“Pride Cometh Before the Tax Trap Fall” Talking Points: QSF Management – Convenience vs. Compliance Qualified Settlement Funds are a tax-based statutory formation similar to