Investors seeking stable income may be solicited by and/or heard a sales pitch from investment advisers to invest in structured settlements, or invest in a structured settlement annuities. But all is not what it seems.
The structured settlement investment in such cases is not an annuity. It is a receivable, and may neither be appropriate nor suitable for vulnerable retirees and personal injury victims.
Here are some things to consider:
When it Comes to The Term "Structured Settlement"...
Note that the structured settlement definition at IRC Section 5891(c)(1), which became effective January 2002, is preceded by the words "for the purposes of this section" (expressly to do with the imposition of an excise tax on structured settlement factoring transactions). Despite this limitation the use of the definition is often expanded by settlement planners, structured settlement brokers, settlement purchasers and industry commentators. Structured settlements had been in existence for over 20 years prior to the enactment of the Victims of Terrorism Tax Relief Act of 2001 (VTTRA), which created IRC Section 5891, ostensibly an attempt to curb structured settlement factoring company abusive business practice. The VTTRA also provides a regulatory framework for exceptions to the excise tax that would be levied pursuant to the act of Congress and collected by the IRS, in the event a structured settlement factoring transaction does not comply with the applicable state structured settlement protection statute.
Some structured settlement investment promoters and intermediaries solicit investors with the blatant lie that factored structured settlement payment streams are annuities. This doesn't jive with the definition of annuity under the insurance laws of most states and the statutory accounting pronouncements of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as well as actions taken to exclude such investments from Life & Health Guaranty Associations in 80% of U.S. states to date and a review of some of the cases that have been litigated, or in ongoing litigation.
Unfortunately the perpetrators of the lie may include certain settlement planners. On February 25, 2019, a presentation at the annual meeting of the Society of Settlement Planners there was a presentation ominously titled "Dealing With a Secondary Annuity Purchase That Has Gone South". Lawyers who patronize settlement planners who pitch the lie about these investments to personal injury lawyers or the lawyer's clients should see past the distraction of money such individuals pay to state or national trial lawyer associations.
In its Statutory Issue Paper160, initially relaxed in December 2018 and finalized April 6, 2019, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (which knows a little something about annuities) expressly opined that acquired structured settlement payments rights (factored structured settlement payment streams) are neither annuities, nor insurance products. [ see NAIC Statutory Issue Paper No. 160 p6 Section 6 Footnote 1 ]
A "secondary market annuity" is not an annuity, period.
That has not stopped players in the secondary market from falsely calling them annuities. One California settlement planner, who held and still holds an active California insurance license, even made a declaration under penalty of perjury to a California Court in 2012 as part of an elaborate effort to convince a California Superior Court judge to approve such investments to feed into a Special Needs Trust for a disabled plaintiff using a Qualified Settlement Fund.
CA Ins Code § 10509.913 (2020) (a) “Annuity” means an annuity that is an insurance product under California law that is individually solicited, regardless of whether or not the product is classified as an individual or group annuity.
The misuse of the term annuity occurred over and over in the California settlement planner's declaration. The declaration ostensibly was designed to "gin up" the judge by falsely stating there was "no change in funding asset". Creative? yes. False? Yes. The California settlement planner's declaration was found on the internet in 2021. One wonders how many times a similar declaration was used by the California settlement planner in the interim with the same or other judges and how many transactions were approved for disabled plaintiffs or minors under the false assumption an annuity was the investment when it was not.
You would think that if it was an annuity it would appear in the "Kinds of Annuities" section in the
California Department of Insurance guide
Annuities for Seniors |What You Need to Know
A. Litigation has already concluded in which investors in structured settlement payment rights lost their entire investment , due to a fraud. Robert and Linda Wall invested retirement funds and purchased the structured settlement payment rights on the advice of their Pittsburgh based financial adviser who when deposed stated the Walls " invested in 5 structured settlement annuities". An intermediary Altium Group, LLC who was sued by the Walls, advertised "Invest in secondary market annuities...Up to 8% returns with no volatility and unparalleled safety of principal"
It was a lie. It was impossible. The Walls were not sold and the Walls did not invest in annuities even though they thought they did. Then disaster struck some time later, when a fraud was discovered in the origination. The Walls sued their financial adviser and the intermediary who did the deal. In the end they lost everything, their investment, the bargained for investment return, the legal fees they had to spend and to add insult to injury they had to pay the legal fees of their adversary under the loser pays clause in their contract. Robert Wall and Linda Wall v Altium Group, LLC. Civil United States District Court Western Pennsylvania Action 16-1044
B. A retiree from Jacksonville Florida had the majority of his thrift savings plan invested in what was labeled a "secondary market annuity". Worlds collided when it was discovered that the acquired payments were originated from victims of Access Funding and the investment payments ended up being suspended pending the outcome of litigation brought by the Maryland Attorney General. The heartbroken retiree filed a FINRA claim against the financial adviser and one of its former employees and was able to get a small settlement after considerable heartache.
C . A California financial adviser and a British company each invested money in factored structured settlement payment streams that turned out to be originated from a structured settlement of a Pennsylvania minor, who was only 10 years old when somehow a pair of structured settlement factoring companies began to bamboozle a number of Butler and Beaver County judges over 8 years .The investors' money was in jeopardy. Was still pending at the time of origipublication, but the parties subsequently reached a confidential settlement.
ZACHARY BARBER, JEFFREY BARBER, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LINDA LEE JENKINS A/K/A/ LINDA LEE BARBER, DECEASED v. BRUCE STANKO, NORTH HILLS PHARMACY SERVICES, LLC; PACERCHECK, INC.; ET AL APPEAL OF: SEMPRA FINANCE, LLC ("SEMPRA") : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 615 WDA 2020 Appeal from the Order Entered June 5, 2020 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Orphans' Court at No(s): No. 4037 of 2005 See Quashed Appeal of Pinnacle Capital, LLC, Michael Pickett and Habitus Funding published May 14, 2021 and Quashed Appeal of Sempra Finance , also published May 14, 2021
D. In 2020, investors in assigned structured settlement investments originated by Genex Capital, and/or assigned to them by Genex, found their investments at risk after they attempted to sell and reassign the assigned payment rights to other investors some years later. Genex Capital objected on the basis that such assignments allegedly violated the terms of its
Receivables
Purchase Agreement, repossessed the payments and assigned them to new investors for consideration. A number of the original investors sued Genex Capital in an effort to get back their investment.
That litigation remains pending in 2024, is set for trial later this year, and further underscores that investors in acquired structured settlements payment rights are buying structured settlement receivables, not structured settlement annuities.
In its answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims in ongoing Arizona litigation cited below, dated June 11, 2021, Genex Capital Corporation admitted, in answering paragraph 31, that "one component of its business involves purchasing from payees future structured settlement payments due under structured settlement annuities and assigning to investors a subset of those rights. .." (emphasis added) ( also multiple other references to "subsets of those rights..." Ibid at 13, 53, 56, 89, 109, 126)
Source: Genex Capital Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v Seeley Capital Management, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation; et al and Related Counterclaim Richard L. Keefer and Vicki L. Keefer, husband and wife; et al; v Genex Capital Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; et al and Genex Capital Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v Richard L. Keefer and Vicki L. Keefer, husband and wife, Hunmi Pak, a married man; E. Dwayne Walls, a married man; and PANABCO, a partnership Arizona Superior Court County of Maricopa Case Nos. CV 2020-013796 and CV2020-004958 (Consolidated) [the pleadings are a matter of public record]
These risks contribute to why investments in structured settlement payment rights from other epoples' structured settlements ("structured settlement receiavbles") may be unsuitable for many investors, including minors, disabled persons and retirees.
#structuredsettlementinvestments #factoredstructuredsettlementpaymentstreams #secondarymarketannuity #secondarymarketannuities #receivablespurchaseagreement #structuredsettlementreceivables
Last updated January 1, 2024
4structures.com, LLC
The Structured Settlements and Settlement Planning Company
43 Harbor Drive, #309 Stamford, CT 06902 USA
888-325-8640
646-849-1588
New York City (Manhattan, Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island), Westchester(NY), Nassau County (NY) , Suffolk County on Long Island (NY), Albany County (NY), Oswego County (NY), Steuben County (NY), Broome County (NY), Onondaga County (NY), Fairfield County (CT), New Haven County (CT), Hartford County (CT) New London County (CT), Tolland County (CT), Litchfield (CT), Middlesex (CT) , Bergen County (NJ), Middlesex County (NJ), Ocean County (NJ)
Structured Settlement Experts and Settlement Planning Consultants for settlements from claims or lawsuits arising out of Aviation accidents, Medical Malpractice, settlements involving Serious Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, Wrongful Incarceration, Employment, Civil Rights, Discrimination of any type, Auto accidents, Motorcycle accidents, Maritime accidents, Workers' Compensation, Product Liability, Real Estate Liability, Construction Defect claims or lawsuits, Landlord/Tenant,
Property, Attorney Fee Deferrals, Funding Agreements, Structured Installment Sales, Environmental Liability and Commercial Dispute settlements.
Structured settlements and structured settlement brokerage, settlement planning, Sudden Money®, financial transitionist, funding agreements and insurance related services provided by 4structures.com LLC.
Financial Advisory Services provided through Groove Financial Advisors , LLC, and its service partners.
Fiduciary services, including the custody and administration of trusts provided via service partners.
Securities and Insurance Products are NOT Insured by the FDIC, nor by any other Federal or State Government Agency, are NOT a Deposit of and are NOT Guaranteed by a Bank or any Bank Affiliate, and securities MAY lose value.
4structures (USPTO Reg. 4640532) , 4structures.com (USPTO Reg. 4640531) , We Know Structured Settlements (USPTO Reg. 3089738),
Because Certain Sells (USPTO Reg. 6237309) and We Know Structured Sales (USPTO Reg. 3490489), are Registered Trademarks of 4structures.com LLC.
John Darer is a Registered Trademark of John Darer (USPTO Reg. 4674907)
John Darer California insurance license 0761076
4structures.com LLC CA license OF19785 d/b/a 4structures Settlement Insurance Agency