Investments in Structured Settlement Receivables EXCLUDED from Guaranty Funds

John Darer • August 1, 2020

NAIC Model Act EXCLUDES Coverage For Acquired Payment Rights

State Life Insurance Guaranty Fund

Investor Warning Regarding Structured Settlement Receivables


Promoters selling structured settlement receivables that may have been intentionally mislabeled annuities, may be duping investors into believing that the "annuity imposters" may enable the investor to receive State Guaranty Fund coverage in the event the underlying insurer is liquidated . Usually the promoter's sales pitch includes the weak disclaimer that "they make no promises in this regard". It's like " you didn't hear it from me but...".  And it's a "big ole BUT".


Were Peddlers of Structured Settlement Receivables to Investors Fully Informed and Did They Fully Inform Investors (Past AND Present)?


The June 2020 State Legislative Brief published by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC") stated that "the guaranty association system ensures that consumers can purchase insurance products with the knowledge that their coverage will be protected in the event of a future company failure or insolvency. In order to ensure policyholders are adequately protected from such failures, in December 2017, the NAIC adopted revisions to the NAIC Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association Model Act (#520) to address issues and concerns with guaranty fund coverage and assessments for any future Long Term Care Insurance (LTCI) insolvencies.Industry groups support these amendments and worked cooperatively with regulators on them".


WHO SHOULD BE CONCERNED?

Investors in Structured Settlement Receivables

Judges (scrutinizing Petitions for a Minor's Settlement which includes Investments in Structured Settlement Receivables)


Section 3 A (5) of the Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association Model Act (#520) states:


This Act shall not provide coverage to :

(a)    A person who is a payee (or beneficiary) of a contract owner resident of this State, if the payee (or beneficiary) is afforded any coverage by the association of another State; or

(b)    A person covered under Paragraph (3) of this subsection, if any coverage is provided by the association of another State to the person; or 

(c)    A  person  who  acquires  rights  to  receive  payments  through  a structured  settlement factoring transaction as defined in 26 U.S.C. 5891(c)(3)(A),  regardless of whether the transaction occurred before or after such section became effective.  [CRITICAL EMPHASIS ADDED]


As of August 2023,  40 states had adopted the 2017 revisions ( AK, AR, AZ, CT, CO, DE, FL, IA, ID, IL, IN, KY, LA, MD, ME, MN, MO, MS, MT,NC,ND,NE,NH, NJ, NV,OK,SC,TN,TX,UT,VA, WA, WV, WY. District of Columbia), and others


Colorado Structured Settlement Investors | No Payment Rights Insolvency Protection (PASSED) - Structured Settlements 4Real® Blog: Structured Settlements | Settlement Planning News and John Darer Reviews (typepad.com)


Bill tracking in Colorado - HB 23-1303 (2023A legislative session) - FastDemocracy

Some settlement planners have actively pushed structured settlement receivables (factored structured settlement payment streams) to plaintiffs in personal injury settlements, through qualified settlement funds,  independent assignment companies or investments for the plaintiff's Settlement Preservation Trusts,  and to trial lawyers for attorney fee deferrals .


  1. In a June 17, 2013 settlement petition to an Arizona court, which I reported about on my Structured Settlement Watchdog blog,  I reported how a settlement planner had apparently advocated for the use of what is mislabeled " secondary market annuities" for a minor Arizona plaintiff, to compete with structured settlement annuities .  I opined in my commentary, that structured settlement payment rights, which are not annuities (and not regulated insurance products),  and were represented to an Arizona judge as 'annuities", was misleading to the Court. The original petition in the matter of In Re Conservatorship of T.S. 1300GC2013 00063  Superior CT AZ Yavapai County also falsely stated to the court that annuities issued from the secondary market are issued by Liberty Mutual.  Saw a similar thing on a qualified assignment in a New York case where the purported "qualified assignment" said the annuity issuer was MetLife. Acquired structured settlement payment rights (structured settlement receivables) are not annuities and therefore the statement is false on its face.  Even, if arguendo the statement were true, Liberty did not issue annuities in the secondary market.


Subsequent to the settlement planner's representations to the Court, Arizona adopted the revisions to the Model Act (#520) in §20-682D. The relevant exclusion paragraph reads as follows:


"14. Structured settlement annuity benefits to which a payee or beneficiary has transferred the payee’s or beneficiary’s rights in a structured settlement factoring transaction as defined in 26 United States code section 5891(c)(3)(A), regardless of whether the transaction occurred before or after that section became effective "  -Arizona law §20-682D


Furthermore , the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Statutory Issue Paper No.160 (finalized April 6, 2019), makes it clear that factored settlement payment streams are not annuities or insurance products.


National Association of Insurance Commissioners and Other Financial Regulators,  Pay Attention!


The National Association of Insurance Commissioners should continue to scrutinize the activities of licensed insurance agents and entities, as well as unlicensed promoters , who


  • misuse the term annuity to insinuate an insurance product while selling investments that are not insurance products ( factored structured settlement payment streams). They may have even used insurance company logos to proliferate the falsehood
  • insinuate statutory insurance protections in their websites and/or marketing materials in their solicitation of investors, in conflict with prohibitions on such activity contained in state insurance laws. 


Last updated March 16, 2025



independent life structured settlement annuities
By John Darer March 16, 2025
In the structured settlement annuity industry, dominated by many of the largest life insurers in the United States, Independent Life Insurance Company (ILIC) achieved significant milestones in 2024. Good news, positives and some concerns discussed in this lattest post.
Prudential and Pacific Life are among the world's most ethical companies
By John Darer March 13, 2025
Prudential and Pacific Life have once again been named among the world's most ethical companies. Prudential received the award for the 11th time., Pacific Life received the award for the 8th time. Prudential and Pacific Life are leading issuers of structured settlement annuities.
structured settlement annuity market expansion 2025
By John Darer March 13, 2025
John Darer reviews structured settlement annuity market expansion featuring 3 new entrants Athene Life & Annuity, American National (ANICO) and Puritan Life as well as MetLife's development of a best in class
settlement agreement and release
By John Darer February 11, 2025
What is a Settlement Agreement and Release? What is the role of a Settlement Agreement and Release in establishing a structured settlement? What is a compromise?
structured settlement market explained
By John Darer February 11, 2025
John Darer reviews the primary structured settlement market, secindary market and tertiary structured settlement markets
tax free structured settlement annuity
By John Darer February 7, 2025
A structured settlement annuity does not drive the tax consequences of structured settlement annuity payments. It is the type of damages the structured settlement annuity payments represent, as reflected in the relevant settlement documentation executed by the settling parties
structured settlement beneficiary
By John Darer January 29, 2025
Structured settlement beneficiary death claim. An executor cannot change the beneficiary of a structured settlement annuity. StructuredTypically, settlement agreements permit the Payee to name or change a beneficiary, provided such change is in writing and submitted to the Assigmment Company or annuity issuer in writing and in proper form.
new york structured settlements, new york city structured settlements, nyc structured settlement cos
By John Darer January 23, 2025
Which life insurance companies write structured settlement annuities for personal injury and wrrongful death settlements in Bronx, Brooklyn, Staten Island, Queens, Manhattan, Long Island, Westchester, Erie, Rockland, Albany,Monroe in 2025 through licensed representatives?
structured settlement annuities
By John Darer January 8, 2025
Why Structured Settlements? Because Certain Sells® Structured settlements offer predictable income streams, which can be appealing to rein in uncertainty. John Darer reviews some other reasons that structured settlements are increasingly being used to settle cases:
structured settlements history
By John Darer December 13, 2024
Structured settlements have roots that trace back more than 100 years, from 1918, when Congress exempted damages for personal injury or sickness from income tax, to the establishment of structured settlements as the core personal injury settlement planning tool it is today.
More Posts