Blog Post

Settlement Agreement Language to Protect Annuitants from Abuse

John Darer • Sep 11, 2020

Mitigate bad structured settlement secondary market outcomes

precautions with structured settlement documentss
Connecticut attorney Edward Stone who has provided legal advocacy for structured settlement annuitants who have been victims of abuse by structured settlement factoring companies and/or their representatives.

Help avoid bad secondary market outcomes. Consider this protection clause for structured settlement agreements.  Greenwich CT lawyer Eddie Stone, who often goes up against factoring companies, suggests some language that he says should be inserted in settlement documents to better protect structured settlement annuitants.

"You do this by stating, ‘Neither the beneficiary of this structured settlement nor any other assignee shall have the power to assign the periodic payments to any third party without a genuine hardship and even then only with the advice of counsel.  Any purported assignment in violation of this provision shall be void ab initio. This provision has been inserted at the insistence of plaintiff’s counsel to protect the periodic payments described in the structured settlement agreement from dissipation.”

Stone, who is a supporter of structured settlements and says "Structured settlements are an excellent way to ensure long-term financial stability. But there are bad apples in every industry. Accident victims and their attorneys must protect themselves".

Eddie Stone is quoted from an article by H. Dennis Beaver, Esq, an attorney from Bakersfield California published by Kiplingers painting a dire picture of the bad apples of the structured settlement secondary market.

"We have all seen television, radio or internet ads which urge cashing in structured settlements.  There are times when it makes sense to sell a small part of the structured settlement payment stream, but what I find so cruel are companies that buy every last dollar from someone with serious injuries, very poor judgment, and little or no financial experience who then winds up as a ward of the state.

"Families need to always keep in mind that the structured settlement was created to provide a stream of tax-free payments over many years to help the injury victim live as normal a life as possible. It was not intended to help someone with no business experience, who has had serious injuries and possible mental impairment, put that secure tax-free income stream at risk in a business venture.”

Settlement Planners, Who Led the Charge For the "Right to Factor" in Settlement Documents Should Adjust Their Focus

In my opinion, settlement planners, led by failed AIG antagonist Richard B. Risk, Jr. who led the charge in 2003, to add "IRC 5891 enabling language" to somehow protect an annuitant's right to factor (and reduce malpractice exposure to plaintiff attorneys, to the point where it is now standard language in settlement documents and qualified assignments),  must now shift the focus to better advise and protect their clients in light of a reality of massive rip offs. Some have recommended that annuities be paid into trusts to accomplish the protection.


Here's an excerpt from how Risk stated his case in an SSP QuickTopic communication from March 3, 2003 (preserved copy on file)

"10/09/2005

Dick Risk 03-03-2003 07:46 PM ET (US)
SSP Press Release 2 - QuickTopic Document Review Page 5 of 10
http://www.quicktopic.com/19/D/dytdpCAFxHckn?inline=1 10/9/2005
1. Notifying claimants of their structured settlement rights;
14
2. Complying with all federal and state laws impacting structured settlement claimants;
15
3. Supporting the public policy behind structured settlements.
16
This would include, as a minimum:
1) Every (qualified) assignment company has a duty to inform every payee of new rights under section 5891. (I suspect
many of the(qualified) assignees take the position that there were no new rights granted if the contract prohibits the sale
of future payments.)
2) Acknowledging the rights granted by 5891 in the settlement agreement and in the "uniform" QA documents".

"Protect Them By having Structured Settlement Paid Into a Trust"?


While structured settlements into trusts might be a viable solution depending on the circumstances, it might add significant costs depending on the trust company, which may render the structure/trust combination solution less suitable.

California Attorney Notification Rule

Attorney Stone's suggestion is of the same mind as the California law which requires that the plaintiff lawyer of record be notified of any attempt to sell structured settlement payment rights within 5 years of the establishment of a structured settlement.

Investor Benefits

Some settlement planners are (and have been) advising plaintiffs and trial lawyers to invest in factored structured settlement payment streams. Some may even create initial interest confusion by labeling these streams annuities even though the factored payment streams are not annuities and carry far greater risk characteristics than annuities. Origination risk or transaction risk is a big differentiator.

Too many naive and unsophisticated people waive their rights to independent professional advice sometimes through the encouragement of unethical and what may sometimes be illegal activities of structured settlement factoring origination firms and their representatives.

Grooming such structured settlement annuitants for financial rape and inducing them to commit fraud about where they live is unfortunately more common than a few isolated incidents. Consider the financial rape I recently reported about on my Structured Settlement Watchdog blog. The unthinkable happened.  Shortly before he turned 18 in February 2020, a Pittsburgh Pennsylvania area high school student discovered he had been financially raped of more than $1,000,0000 in structured settlement payments. The rapes began when he was only 10 years old. This potentially puts investor money in jeopardy as the ensuing litigation plays out.

Acquisition of structured settlement payment rights might be a bit safer if Stone's suggestion is implemented at the time a structured settlement is established.

#structuredsettlementdocumentation  #structuredsettlemenhtprotection  #settlementagreement #structuredsettlementagreement

 
risk adjusted capital ratio and structured settlements
By John Darer 07 May, 2024
What is Risk Adjusted Capital Ratio (RACR) What does RACR Ratio mean forr your structured settlement annuity company, or one that you are considering. How does RACR compare with RBC Ratio?
Risk Based Capital
By John Darer 06 May, 2024
What is Risk Based Capital? What Does the RBC Ratio Mean for Your Structured Settlement Annuity Company?
certified financial transitionist
By John Darer 25 Apr, 2024
A Certified Financial Transitionist is trained and certified to help clients navigate through major life events and the financial transitions that accompany them. Especially useful for personal injury victims and wrongful death survivors to help prepare for the important decisions they will need to make.
Sequencing Risk for Those Receiving Legal Settlements
By John Darer 22 Apr, 2024
John Darer reviews sequencing risk and the impact of early spending after settlement. Sequencing and Decumulation risk is a factor for recipients of legal settlements and should be addressed in advance of settlement as aprt of settlement planning and wealth orientation.
structured settlement rate lock ins
By John Darer 21 Apr, 2024
A structured settlement lock-in means that the structured settlement annuity issuer will guarantee the cost of a specific benefit stream in exchange for the "quid pro quo" of a commitment to accept or purchase. The guarantee could be a week , or 6 months.
market based structured settlements for lawyers, law firms or plaintiffs
By John Darer 14 Apr, 2024
An introduction to Market Based Structured Settements for Plaintiffs, Lawyers and Law Firms and Settling Parties
new york structured settlements, new york city structured settlements, nyc structured settlement cos
By John Darer 16 Mar, 2024
Which life insurance companies write structured settlement annuities for personal injury and wrrongful death settlements in Bronx, Brooklyn, Staten Island, Queens, Manhattan, Long Island, Westchester, Erie, Rockland, Albany,Monroe in 2024 through licensed representatives?
flying inverted
By John Darer 16 Mar, 2024
While rising yields have narrowed the gap for defendants in New York CPLR 50A and 50B projections, plaintiffs can still " fly inverted" and get plenty of "lift" when negotiating settlements by using savvy settlement experts
construction defect structured settlements
By John Darer 12 Mar, 2024
Structured settlements can be used where construction defects lead to personal physical injury, physical sickness, or loss of life. In addition, structured settlements may be helpful to plaintiffs who wish to spread out basis, smooth out capital gains or income
structured settlement beneficiary
By John Darer 08 Mar, 2024
Structured settlement beneficiary death claim. An executor cannot change the beneficiary of a structured settlement annuity. Typically, settlement agreements permit the Payee to name or change a beneficiary, provided such change is in writing and submitted to the Assigmment Company or the annuity issuer in writing and in proper form. An executor is a court appointed representative of the decedent, or in this case, deceased structured settlement annuitant. The insurance beneficiary designation is a contract between the decedent and the insurance company that was entered into prior to the decedent's death.
More Posts
Share by: