Non Qualified Assignment vs Qualified Assignment
John Darer • April 2, 2018
Difference Between Structured Settlement Assignments
Both a non qualified assignment / non-qualified structured settlement, and qualified assignments are forms of settlement used to resolve disputes, or claims for damages, with some portion of the damages paid in future periodic payments.
In each case, following the assignment, the assignment company replaces the Defendant or Defendant's Insurer as the future periodic payment obligor through a legal novation.
When is a Qualified Assignment Used with a Structured Settlement?
A qualified assignment is used to help resolve lawsuits and claims involving damages that fall within the meaning of IRC 104(a)(1) or IRC 104(a)(2), namely payment of damages for physical injury, physical sickness or wrongful death, or workers compensation.
When is a Non Qualified Assignment Used with a Structured Settlement?
A
non qualified assignment is used to help resolve lawsuits and claims involving taxable damages, There are many types of lawsuits where a non qualified assignment can be used. Some examples are claims or lawsuits which involve employment, sexual harassment. qui tam (whistle blower) intellectual property, breach of contract. In addition non qualified assignments are used for structured installment sales, oil & gas lease bonuses, celebrity endorsement fees. Read more about
non qualified assignments.
Note that damages for wrongful conviction or
wrongful imprisonment
that qualify for a tax exemption under IRC 139F, must be assigned via a non qualified assignment, even though payments are not taxable. The reason is that the IRC 130 exemption governing qualified assignments does not include IRC 139F damages under permissible obligations to assign.
Last updated December 28, 2023
In the structured settlement annuity industry, dominated by many of the largest life insurers in the United States, Independent Life Insurance Company (ILIC) achieved significant milestones in 2024. Good news, positives and some concerns discussed in this lattest post.
Prudential and Pacific Life have once again been named among the world's most ethical companies. Prudential received the award for the 11th time., Pacific Life received the award for the 8th time. Prudential and Pacific Life are leading issuers of structured settlement annuities.
John Darer reviews structured settlement annuity market expansion featuring 3 new entrants Athene Life & Annuity, American National (ANICO) and Puritan Life as well as MetLife's development of a best in class
What is a Settlement Agreement and Release? What is the role of a Settlement Agreement and Release in establishing a structured settlement? What is a compromise?
John Darer reviews the primary structured settlement market, secindary market and tertiary structured settlement markets
A structured settlement annuity does not drive the tax consequences of structured settlement annuity payments. It is the type of damages the structured settlement annuity payments represent, as reflected in the relevant settlement documentation executed by the settling parties
Structured settlement beneficiary death claim. An executor cannot change the beneficiary of a structured settlement annuity. StructuredTypically, settlement agreements permit the Payee to name or change a beneficiary, provided such change is in writing and submitted to the Assigmment Company or annuity issuer in writing and in proper form.
Which life insurance companies write structured settlement annuities for personal injury and wrrongful death settlements in Bronx, Brooklyn, Staten Island, Queens, Manhattan, Long Island, Westchester, Erie, Rockland, Albany,Monroe in 2025 through licensed representatives?
Why Structured Settlements? Because Certain Sells® Structured settlements offer predictable income streams, which can be appealing to rein in uncertainty. John Darer reviews some other reasons that structured settlements are increasingly being used to settle cases:
Structured settlements have roots that trace back more than 100 years, from 1918, when Congress exempted damages for personal injury or sickness from income tax, to the establishment of structured settlements as the core personal injury settlement planning tool it is today.
