Legal Malpractice Structured Settlements

John Darer • July 18, 2022

Structured Settlements a Vital Mitigation Tool After Blum

legal malpractice structured settlements

What is a Legal Malpractice Claim?


Legal malpractice is a type of legal claim that a lawyer's or law firm's client can bring when a lawyer breaches his or her legal duty to the client.


If you are bringing a legal malpractice claim based on your attorney's or law firm's negligence, you need to show:

  1. Your lawyer had a duty to represent you competently
  2. Your lawyer made a mistake or otherwise acted in a way that breached their duty to you
  3. Their actions caused harm to you and you lost money as a result     Source: FindLaw


Is a Legal Malpractice Claim Tax Exempt?


Blum v Commissioner, Cite as 129 AFTR 2d 2022-1170, Code Sec(s) 104; 61; 6662, (CA9), 06/02/2022


  • The express terms of Blum's settlement agreement make clear that there was no direct causal link between the legal malpractice settlement and her physical injuries.
  • The settlement agreement expressly states that Blum and her attorneys maintain "that Blum did not sustain any physical injuries as a result of the alleged negligence of either Kozlowski or Celski [her attorneys]."
  • And the agreement further states that it was entered into "for the purpose of compromising and settling the [malpractice] dispute between [the parties]."


Taken together, the express terms of the agreement demonstrate that the settlement was entered to compensate Blum for the harm caused by her lawyers' legal malpractice, rather than the physical injuries [pg. 2022-1171] she sustained in her underlying negligence action. As the Tax Court accurately put it, the terms of the agreement "make clear that the payment was in lieu of damages for legal malpractice."


When the express terms of the agreement make the purpose of the settlement clear, we need not look to the intent of the payors. See Rivera, 430 F.3d at 1257. Because the agreement's express terms clearly indicate that Blum was not compensated for her physical injuries, the Tax Court properly concluded that the settlement proceeds were not exempt from taxation under § 104(a)(2).


In order for a legal malpractice claim to be tax exempt, the damages that the original claim were to be for were received “on account of personal physical injuries or personal physical sickness.


Aames v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 189; 1990 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 8; 94 T.C. No. 13


The issue of the taxation of legal malpractice recoveries arising from a physical injury claim was examined in an older case, Aames v. Commissioner.  In Aames, the court held that only the interest component of the settlement, not the malpractice recovery itself, was taxable.   Read Aames v Commisioner Tax Court Decision


P sued his attorney for malpractice for the negligent handling of a personal injury action. P was awarded damages on the malpractice claim together with interest thereon from Jan. 27, 1984 to Apr. 1, 1986. Held, the interest was not paid "on account of" P's personal injury. Sec. 104(a)(2), I.R.C., as amended. Held, further, the interest portion of the damage award is taxable income to P. Sec. 61(a)(4).


The malpractice claim itself need not be a tort, as that requirement was removed from Section 104(a)(2) in 2012 in T.D. 9573 (2012-12 IRB 498).  When determining the exclusion from gross income the IRS looks at the nature of the claim which was the actual basis for the settlement. Seay v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 32, 37 (1972).


From there the proper inquiry to conduct is “in lieu of what were damages awarded or paid?” Church v. Commissioner, 80 T.C. 1104, 1107 (1983); Delaney v. Commissioner, 99 F.3d 20, 23-24 (1st Cir. 1996); Fono v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 680, 694 (1982), aff’d without pub. opinion, 749 F.2d 37 (9th Cir. 1984).  If viewed by the IRS, they would consider all the facts, including:


  • the allegations contained in the taxpayer’s complaint;
  • the evidence presented and the arguments made in the court proceeding; and
  • the intent of the payor.

Threlkeld v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1294, 1306 (1986), aff’d, 848 F.2d 81 (6th Cir. 1988); Bent v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 236, 245 (1986), aff’d, 835 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1987).


When Do You Raise the Concept of a Legal Malpractice Structured Settlement?


A legal malpractice structured settlement may be explored in conjunction with a structured settlement expert, by plaintiffs, defendants, their legal representatives in the legal, malpractice matter, or the legal malpractice insurer. 


Taxable Legal Malpractice Settlements Require Careful Settlement Planning


If a structured settlement is desired in a legal malpractice case Legal malpractice cases with structured settlements are most often concluded via a non qualified assignment.  With taxable damages cases the use of a Plaintiff Recovery Trust may be helpful. Advance planning is required!


With the right type of case, even if a life insurance company agrees to accept it,  you’ll want to be sure the settlement agreement specifically details why the settlement payments are excludable from gross income under Section 104(a)(2) of the Code. 


For more information about legal malpractice settlement planning please contact John Darer at 888-325-8640, or complete and send the contact form below..


Last updated September 25, 2022


#legalmalpractice #NYClegalmalpractice #NYlegalmalpractice  #CTlegalmalpractice  #plaintiffrecoverytrust  #FLlegalmalpractice #westchesterlegalmalpractice  #stamfordlegalmalpractice  #newhavenlegalmalpractice  #hartfordlegalmalpractice 




independent life structured settlement annuities
By John Darer March 16, 2025
In the structured settlement annuity industry, dominated by many of the largest life insurers in the United States, Independent Life Insurance Company (ILIC) achieved significant milestones in 2024. Good news, positives and some concerns discussed in this lattest post.
Prudential and Pacific Life are among the world's most ethical companies
By John Darer March 13, 2025
Prudential and Pacific Life have once again been named among the world's most ethical companies. Prudential received the award for the 11th time., Pacific Life received the award for the 8th time. Prudential and Pacific Life are leading issuers of structured settlement annuities.
structured settlement annuity market expansion 2025
By John Darer March 13, 2025
John Darer reviews structured settlement annuity market expansion featuring 3 new entrants Athene Life & Annuity, American National (ANICO) and Puritan Life as well as MetLife's development of a best in class
settlement agreement and release
By John Darer February 11, 2025
What is a Settlement Agreement and Release? What is the role of a Settlement Agreement and Release in establishing a structured settlement? What is a compromise?
structured settlement market explained
By John Darer February 11, 2025
John Darer reviews the primary structured settlement market, secindary market and tertiary structured settlement markets
tax free structured settlement annuity
By John Darer February 7, 2025
A structured settlement annuity does not drive the tax consequences of structured settlement annuity payments. It is the type of damages the structured settlement annuity payments represent, as reflected in the relevant settlement documentation executed by the settling parties
structured settlement beneficiary
By John Darer January 29, 2025
Structured settlement beneficiary death claim. An executor cannot change the beneficiary of a structured settlement annuity. StructuredTypically, settlement agreements permit the Payee to name or change a beneficiary, provided such change is in writing and submitted to the Assigmment Company or annuity issuer in writing and in proper form.
new york structured settlements, new york city structured settlements, nyc structured settlement cos
By John Darer January 23, 2025
Which life insurance companies write structured settlement annuities for personal injury and wrrongful death settlements in Bronx, Brooklyn, Staten Island, Queens, Manhattan, Long Island, Westchester, Erie, Rockland, Albany,Monroe in 2025 through licensed representatives?
structured settlement annuities
By John Darer January 8, 2025
Why Structured Settlements? Because Certain Sells® Structured settlements offer predictable income streams, which can be appealing to rein in uncertainty. John Darer reviews some other reasons that structured settlements are increasingly being used to settle cases:
structured settlements history
By John Darer December 13, 2024
Structured settlements have roots that trace back more than 100 years, from 1918, when Congress exempted damages for personal injury or sickness from income tax, to the establishment of structured settlements as the core personal injury settlement planning tool it is today.
More Posts